Using PRDs for Stakeholder Alignment

The best PRD in the world is worthless if no one reads it or agrees with it. This article is about the often-overlooked skill of using PRDs as alignment tools.

The Alignment Problem

Every PM has experienced this: you write a detailed PRD, get it “approved,” then discover weeks later that different stakeholders had completely different expectations.

• Engineering thought they had creative freedom on the UI
• Design thought the timeline was flexible
• Your manager thought the scope was smaller
• The executive sponsor thought the scope was larger

The PRD was the same document. The interpretations were wildly different.

Why PRDs Alone Don’t Create Alignment

A document can’t create alignment. Alignment happens through conversation. But a document can:

1. Structure conversations so they’re productive
2. Record decisions so they’re not forgotten
3. Surface disagreements before they become problems
4. Create accountability by documenting commitments

The PRD is a tool for alignment, not a substitute for it.

Stakeholder-Specific Strategies

Different stakeholders need different things from a PRD. Here’s how to use PRDs to align each group.

Executives

What they care about: Business impact, strategic fit, resource requirements, timelines, risks

How to use the PRD:

1. Lead with the “why”: Start with business context and expected impact
2. Keep it high-level: Use executive summaries liberally
3. Quantify everything: Revenue impact, user growth, efficiency gains
4. Be explicit about resources: What you need and why
5. Surface risks proactively: Show you’ve thought through what could go wrong

Alignment conversation: Present the executive summary, then ask: “Does this align with our strategic priorities? Are the expected outcomes worth the investment?”

Engineering Leadership

What they care about: Technical feasibility, architecture implications, resource allocation, timeline realism

How to use the PRD:

1. Share early drafts: Get technical input before finalizing
2. Focus on “what” not “how”: Describe requirements, not solutions
3. Be specific about constraints: Performance, scale, security requirements
4. Acknowledge uncertainty: Call out areas where technical discovery is needed
5. Include success metrics: Help them understand how to measure “done”

Alignment conversation: “Here’s what we need to build and why. What technical considerations am I missing? Is this timeline realistic?”

Engineering Team

What they care about: Clear requirements, acceptance criteria, context for decisions, scope boundaries

How to use the PRD:

1. Provide context: Help them understand why decisions were made
2. Be specific: Vague requirements create rework
3. Cover edge cases: They’ll ask about them anyway
4. Define “out of scope”: Prevent scope creep
5. Include designs: Visual references reduce misinterpretation

Alignment conversation: Walk through the PRD section by section. “Does this make sense? What questions do you have? What did I miss?”

Design Team

What they care about: User needs, design constraints, timeline for design work, how their work fits the bigger picture

How to use the PRD:

1. Share user research: Context on who we’re designing for
2. Define the problem, not the solution: Leave room for design exploration
3. Include competitive references: Show what others have done
4. Specify constraints upfront: Technical limitations, brand guidelines
5. Clarify design timeline: When do you need concepts vs. final designs?

Alignment conversation: “Here’s the problem we’re solving and for whom. What design considerations should we explore? What constraints do you need me to clarify?”

Cross-Functional Partners (Legal, Security, Marketing, etc.)

What they care about: Their domain-specific requirements, timeline to be involved, what they need to approve

How to use the PRD:

1. Call out their requirements explicitly: Don’t bury legal requirements in page 15
2. Share early: Give them time to review
3. Ask for their input directly: Don’t assume they’ll speak up
4. Document their requirements: Make it clear their input was incorporated

Alignment conversation: “I’ve tried to capture the [legal/security/marketing] requirements here. Did I miss anything? When do you need to be involved?”

The Alignment Process

Here’s a step-by-step process for using PRDs to create alignment:

Phase 1: Draft & Input (Before Writing)

1. Talk to key stakeholders before writing anything
2. Understand their concerns and constraints
3. Identify potential conflicts early
4. Get rough agreement on problem and approach

Phase 2: Review & Refine (First Draft)

1. Share draft with key stakeholders
2. Ask specific questions: “Does this capture what we discussed?”
3. Document feedback and how you addressed it
4. Iterate until major concerns are resolved

Phase 3: Align & Commit (Final Review)

1. Present to full stakeholder group together
2. Walk through key decisions and tradeoffs
3. Surface any remaining disagreements explicitly
4. Get explicit commitment from each stakeholder
5. Document who approved and when

Phase 4: Maintain & Update (Ongoing)

1. Keep the PRD current as things change
2. Communicate changes to stakeholders
3. Re-align when significant changes occur
4. Reference the PRD in team discussions

Techniques for Surfacing Disagreement

Disagreement isn’t bad—hidden disagreement is. Here’s how to surface it:

The “What Could Go Wrong” Question

Ask stakeholders: “What concerns do you have about this plan?” Document every concern, even ones you think are unfounded.

The Explicit Tradeoff

When you’ve made a tradeoff, state it explicitly: “We chose A over B because X. Does anyone disagree with this tradeoff?”

The Devil’s Advocate

Ask: “What’s the strongest argument against this approach?” This gives skeptics permission to share concerns.

The Assumption Check

List key assumptions explicitly. Ask: “Which of these assumptions do you disagree with?”

The Pre-Mortem

Ask: “Imagine this project failed. What was the most likely cause?” This surfaces concerns people are hesitant to share directly.

Common Alignment Pitfalls

Silent Disagreement

Someone disagrees but doesn’t say so. The project proceeds with hidden misalignment.

Fix: Create psychological safety. Ask direct questions. Follow up privately with quiet stakeholders.

False Consensus

Everyone agrees, but they’re agreeing to different things because the PRD is ambiguous.

Fix: Be specific. Use examples. Ask stakeholders to explain their understanding back to you.

Authority Without Input

The most senior person approves, but the people doing the work weren’t consulted.

Fix: Get input from ICs before executive review. Make sure executors feel heard.

The Moving Target

Requirements change but stakeholders aren’t kept in sync.

Fix: Version your PRD. Communicate changes explicitly. Re-align on significant changes.

The Forgotten PRD

PRD is created, then never referenced again.

Fix: Make the PRD a living document. Reference it in sprint planning, design reviews, and status updates.

Using AI for Alignment

AI tools can help with the alignment process:

1. Generate multiple versions: Create executive summary, technical spec, and design brief from one source
2. Identify gaps: AI can spot missing sections that stakeholders will ask about
3. Check for ambiguity: Flag vague requirements that could cause misalignment
4. Summarize feedback: Synthesize input from multiple stakeholders

Conclusion

A PRD isn’t just a document—it’s an alignment tool. Use it to:

• Surface disagreements before they become problems
• Document decisions so they’re not forgotten
• Create accountability by recording commitments
• Maintain alignment as the project evolves

The goal isn’t a perfect document. It’s a shared understanding among everyone who needs to execute.

---

Thig.ai helps you create PRDs that stakeholders actually read—clear, well-structured, and customized for your audience. Try it free.